Thursday, September 24, 2009

Opinions, please . . .

If you were attending a conference and had to choose between multiple sessions that were of equal interest to you, would you choose one that promised to be in 3D?

5 comments:

Angie Ledbetter said...

I don't think so...might get old, and I'd want to get as much from different perspectives as possible. (Or maybe it's just my old age that makes 3-D not sound appealing.) :)

Dean @ Pro Copy Tips said...

Is it real 3D or the kind of 3D where you have to wear the cardboard pair of glasses? Because those things never fit over my own glasses.

8)

hugh.c.mcbride said...

As I rule, I try never to pass up opportunities to wear funny glasses or rented shoes. Unless one of the other sessions features bowling or men's wedding wear, I'd go with the 3D option :-)

Amie said...

Angie . . . what if I told you only a quarter of it was 3D?

Dean . . . what if the viewers were more like opera glasses, and you only had to hold them up to your eyes? And what, out of curiousity, is "real" 3D?

Hugh . . . LOL!

Lori said...

I opt for 3D for the same reasons Hugh suggests. And Amie? If the glasses must be held up to one's eyes, one must extend pinkie and tilt the head back ever-so-slightly, and feigning a crusty British accent, say things akin to "Capital show, old bean."