Posts
Little, Big
3 months ago
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Opinions, please . . .
If you were attending a conference and had to choose between multiple sessions that were of equal interest to you, would you choose one that promised to be in 3D?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I don't think so...might get old, and I'd want to get as much from different perspectives as possible. (Or maybe it's just my old age that makes 3-D not sound appealing.) :)
Is it real 3D or the kind of 3D where you have to wear the cardboard pair of glasses? Because those things never fit over my own glasses.
8)
As I rule, I try never to pass up opportunities to wear funny glasses or rented shoes. Unless one of the other sessions features bowling or men's wedding wear, I'd go with the 3D option :-)
Angie . . . what if I told you only a quarter of it was 3D?
Dean . . . what if the viewers were more like opera glasses, and you only had to hold them up to your eyes? And what, out of curiousity, is "real" 3D?
Hugh . . . LOL!
I opt for 3D for the same reasons Hugh suggests. And Amie? If the glasses must be held up to one's eyes, one must extend pinkie and tilt the head back ever-so-slightly, and feigning a crusty British accent, say things akin to "Capital show, old bean."
Post a Comment